The Philosophy on the Legalization of Drugs Essay Example for Free

The Philosophy on the Legalization of Drugs EssayThere argon many disputed topics being debated about in the United States. maven topic most often debated about is the legalization of drugs. Of course peck have their own beliefs and opinions on the subject, scarce are the arguments discussed about actually valid? Is there enough evidence supporting the premises they claim? These are interrogations we should ask when observing the arguments heap are presenting to defend their beliefs. I believe that drugs should non be legalized for several reasons, but as stated above, different people have different opinions. One of the arguments presented from the people who believe that drugs should be legalized is that the government should not interfere with peoples activities as long as it is not affecting other peoples rights. They state exactly, As far as morality is concerned, the decision to use or not use drugs is a personal one that does not directly impinge upon the rights of others, and the government should never forbid activities that do not impinge upon the rights of others. I believe that there are many things wrong with this argument, but the main problem here is that there is no evidence to support the premise, therefore I see it as a false premise.I take ont understand how they can say that drugs doesnt impinge upon the rights of others when there are drug related crimes happening every day. When people are gritty on drugs, their minds are altered. Many times while under the influence of an illegal substance, people will commit crimes and put other peoples life in danger. This obviously affects the rights of others because people should not have to be put into danger because of other peoples activities.The legalization of drugs would make it much easily accessible, which in the end would result in more crimes and more people getting hurt. Another argument presented is that everything is dangerous. They state Driving on the freeways in L. A. is very dangerous and leads to a good many deaths and injuries thus, it creates suffering in loved ones, and society as a whole is often called upon to pay for the medical expenses of those injured in accidents. The point is this if youre going to forbid drugs for the above reason, then you ought to forbid anything which is in the least bit dangerous. This argument is questionable.Yes, it is true that everything is dangerous, but that is not the part of the argument that is under question. What it is thats under question in this argument is what theyre saying about forbidding anything thats dangerous if theyre going to forbid drugs that are dangerous. It is true that everything is dangerous, but drugs are not only dangerous, but they are mind altering. If you go about your day and submit dangers, being under the influence of drugs makes your dangers so much higher, because you are not in a stable state of mind. So with this argument we must question the dangers of normal activities versus mind altering activities.The legalization of drugs will definitely result in more danger, and make regular activities dangerous. For example driving, it is illegal for people to develop under the influence, but if people are going to be high all the time, they will most likely not hesitate getting into a car to get to where they need. As they stated, driving is a dangerous activity. The point here is, driving under the influence is an even more dangerous activity. Drugs are not necessities, but in current times, driving is a necessity. We should continue to try and keep people safe by prohibiting the unnecessary dangers.